Somewhere in the quieter parts of the Ukraine is a workshop full of luthiers (guitar makers and repairs), and Ms Shpachuk has a channel. Marvel at how much work goes into getting the neck of a guitar right. The neck and frets are precision engineering in disguise.
Friday, 19 April 2024
Tuesday, 16 April 2024
Brandon D’Eon - Cliffs of Dover
Cliffs of Dover is a venerable Eric Johnson instrumental that seems to be for electric guitar what Angie was or is to acoustic guitar. Brandon D’Eon is a twenty-something jazz guitar graduate with a theatrical manner and what looks like a well-subscribed guitar course.
Yep, it’s gratuitous catch-up time. Eight YT channels I’ve been watching on and off recently.
Friday, 12 April 2024
The Subtle Genius of the Middle-Position Selector of the Les Paul
I’ve recently come to appreciate the subtle genius of the middle-position selector of the Les Paul.
Need to turn the guitar down but don’t want to walk back to the amp / digital controller? Just turn either of the volume pots to 0 - shuts down the guitar output. (It’s a feature of the circuit design, not a bug.)
Need to turn it up for a solo? Turn the dominant (or both) pots to 9 or 10 - doubles the volume. (That’s a feature of the volume pots, not a bug.)
Need to turn it back to play rhythm again? Turn the pots back to where they were, usually 8 or below.
But most of all…
The middle position lets us mix the outputs of the pickups to taste using the volume pots. (The Rhythm / Lead positions are limiting cases of the mixes available with the middle position.)
Is the bridge too thin and nasal? To get a bridge-y tone with a bit more body, put the bridge pot somewhere between 7 and 10, and the neck somewhere between 2 and 4. (*)
Is the neck too full and jazzy? To snap it up a bit, put the neck pot somewhere between 7 and 10, and the bridge pot somewhere between 2 and 4.
Something balanced? Put both on 6 or 7, or 9 / 10 if you want to be loud.
A Strat offers five discrete mixes of its pickups, the Les Paul offers a (theoretically) continuous variation.
When I’m creating a Preset on the HX Effects, I set the volume pots at 6 (which is the actual mid-point when using a Katana) and the tone pots at 7. Then I can use the volume pots to get a more bridge-y or more neck-y version of the tone, and I’m not having to create something that will deal with the nasal bridge signal, and consequently be useless on the neck, or vice-versa.
Need to turn the guitar down but don’t want to walk back to the amp / digital controller? Just turn either of the volume pots to 0 - shuts down the guitar output. (It’s a feature of the circuit design, not a bug.)
Need to turn it up for a solo? Turn the dominant (or both) pots to 9 or 10 - doubles the volume. (That’s a feature of the volume pots, not a bug.)
Need to turn it back to play rhythm again? Turn the pots back to where they were, usually 8 or below.
But most of all…
The middle position lets us mix the outputs of the pickups to taste using the volume pots. (The Rhythm / Lead positions are limiting cases of the mixes available with the middle position.)
Is the bridge too thin and nasal? To get a bridge-y tone with a bit more body, put the bridge pot somewhere between 7 and 10, and the neck somewhere between 2 and 4. (*)
Is the neck too full and jazzy? To snap it up a bit, put the neck pot somewhere between 7 and 10, and the bridge pot somewhere between 2 and 4.
Something balanced? Put both on 6 or 7, or 9 / 10 if you want to be loud.
A Strat offers five discrete mixes of its pickups, the Les Paul offers a (theoretically) continuous variation.
When I’m creating a Preset on the HX Effects, I set the volume pots at 6 (which is the actual mid-point when using a Katana) and the tone pots at 7. Then I can use the volume pots to get a more bridge-y or more neck-y version of the tone, and I’m not having to create something that will deal with the nasal bridge signal, and consequently be useless on the neck, or vice-versa.
Tuesday, 9 April 2024
The Creation of Marshall Amplifiers
On the third day, the Lord did create Marshall amplifiers, and he played his Les Paul through them, and heard the distortion, and even with the Telecaster and the Stratocaster, even the ES335 and SG, it was good.
Sayth the LORD, this sound shall be only for Marshalls. Not even unto the Hi-Watt and Mesa/Boogie. And the Fender shall be clean, and scooped in the mid-range. Even the amp that is Orange shall not have this sound.
He who wishes for this sound shall not find it in the pedals that are between the guitar and the amplifier. This sound shall be unto the gold-and-black that shall be the sign of the Marshall for evermore.
And those who despair that their guitar may be un-blessed, and have a nasal bridge tone, shall play into a Marshall, and what they hear shall be as from a blessed guitar. For the Marshall is the amplifier of the LORD, and all who play through one shall have good tone.
(Yep, my guitar friend recently acquired an f-off JCM800 head to go with a 2x12 Marshall cabinet. I had a play with it recently. Everything you have heard about the ineffable nature of that Marshall sound is true.)
Sayth the LORD, this sound shall be only for Marshalls. Not even unto the Hi-Watt and Mesa/Boogie. And the Fender shall be clean, and scooped in the mid-range. Even the amp that is Orange shall not have this sound.
He who wishes for this sound shall not find it in the pedals that are between the guitar and the amplifier. This sound shall be unto the gold-and-black that shall be the sign of the Marshall for evermore.
And those who despair that their guitar may be un-blessed, and have a nasal bridge tone, shall play into a Marshall, and what they hear shall be as from a blessed guitar. For the Marshall is the amplifier of the LORD, and all who play through one shall have good tone.
(Yep, my guitar friend recently acquired an f-off JCM800 head to go with a 2x12 Marshall cabinet. I had a play with it recently. Everything you have heard about the ineffable nature of that Marshall sound is true.)
Tuesday, 2 April 2024
But Now I Feel That Our Politicians Are Actually Freaking Clueless
I have known times when politicians have been out of touch, or have failed to read the electorate. I have known times when they have proposed policies that belonged to a world that had passed already. Even during those times, I had the feeling that they knew what was happening in the world, what were the important issues, and that they shared, broadly, the same hopes, fears and dreams as the rest of us.
Same for journalists, civil servants, local government officials, and to a slightly lesser extent, academics and the managers of State or quasi-State organisations.
But now I feel that our politicians are actually freaking clueless: they do not understand what is happening in the world, they can’t read the electorate, they are focussed on trivial issues to distract themselves and us, and most of all, that they do not share our hopes, fears and dreams. Instead, the politicians, and a significant proportion of civil servants, local government officials, academics and the managers of State or quasi-State organisations, have completely different priorities, leading them to propose policies that make our lives more difficult, and worse than that, think that we should not have the hopes, fears and dreams that we do have.
Most of them were around in 2020-2022. The era of the Coronavirus Act, and the restrictions imposed under a dubious interpretation of powers granted by the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, was the most shameful period in the history of UK politics, journalism, academia and public administration, which fell over themselves to outdo each other in their fealty to the Church of the One True Virus, its prophet on Earth, Anthony Fauci, and his Bishop in the UK, Matt Hancock.
Events proved that none of those prophets, nor any of their followers, had the slightest clue what they were doing or talking about. They were panicked and bullied by the press - who wanted to Get Boris - and their own advisors, who had delusions of competence and held us in contempt. None of them had the gumption to ask: if this is so deadly, how come anyone was left alive on those cruise ships?. It’s a simple, common-sense question, and nobody asked it.
Most of them are still in one post or another. But now they know they aren’t up to the task of sorting out the cultural, economic and political mess that is post-Brexit UK. So they are in denial, and sling distractions in the political air like so much chaff.
Same for journalists, civil servants, local government officials, and to a slightly lesser extent, academics and the managers of State or quasi-State organisations.
But now I feel that our politicians are actually freaking clueless: they do not understand what is happening in the world, they can’t read the electorate, they are focussed on trivial issues to distract themselves and us, and most of all, that they do not share our hopes, fears and dreams. Instead, the politicians, and a significant proportion of civil servants, local government officials, academics and the managers of State or quasi-State organisations, have completely different priorities, leading them to propose policies that make our lives more difficult, and worse than that, think that we should not have the hopes, fears and dreams that we do have.
Most of them were around in 2020-2022. The era of the Coronavirus Act, and the restrictions imposed under a dubious interpretation of powers granted by the Public Health (Control of Disease) Act 1984, was the most shameful period in the history of UK politics, journalism, academia and public administration, which fell over themselves to outdo each other in their fealty to the Church of the One True Virus, its prophet on Earth, Anthony Fauci, and his Bishop in the UK, Matt Hancock.
Events proved that none of those prophets, nor any of their followers, had the slightest clue what they were doing or talking about. They were panicked and bullied by the press - who wanted to Get Boris - and their own advisors, who had delusions of competence and held us in contempt. None of them had the gumption to ask: if this is so deadly, how come anyone was left alive on those cruise ships?. It’s a simple, common-sense question, and nobody asked it.
Most of them are still in one post or another. But now they know they aren’t up to the task of sorting out the cultural, economic and political mess that is post-Brexit UK. So they are in denial, and sling distractions in the political air like so much chaff.
Tuesday, 26 March 2024
Chasing Tone
When I play an acoustic, the sound is what it is. I can modify it slightly by the choice of pick, where I pick the strings, and where or if I rest my right hand on the body. These are slight changes on the fixed underlying sound of the guitar, which is itself a variation within narrow limits of the fundamental sound of an acoustic.
Then there’s the electric guitar. There are a bunch of genre-based sounds for the electric. There’s the “jazz tone”; the “Nashville country twang”, if anyone still uses it; the “blues tone”, which is not to be confused with the edge-of-breakup “blues-rock” tone; there’s the heavily distorted “metal tone”, with variations for each type of metal; and then there’s the “ambient sound”, characterised by endless variations of echo, delay and reverb. There’s the Andy Summers chorus sound, the Eddie Van Halen “brown sound”, the Hank B Marvin 60’s instrumental sound, the “legendary Beano album sound”, and of course, there’s The Edge. The list goes on quite a way.
There’s a relationship between tone and music. Put a Blues Drive in the chain, and you’re going to wind up playing minor pentatonics. Flip to the neck pickup and keep a clean sound, and you’re going to play some kind of jazz. Perhaps if I knew what the music I was looking for was, I could find the sound for it. Or do we find the sound and then the music comes?
I want some sustain (reverb YES, compression NO) to open up the sound, a little texture (distortion or overdrive) and some variation (modulation). It needs to be full (some gain and easy on the treble) as well as well-defined (not too much gain or bass). No one effect should dominate, but all of them should be audible. Each individual note should be a sound interesting enough to listen to on its own. It has to work all over the neck, not just in one position, and it has to work at bedroom volumes.
Also, can I get some vanilla ice-cream and an espresso with that?
There are three reasons for spending a lot of time futzing around with pedals and effects boards. Such as I have been doing for far too long.
A) You play in a tribute band and want to get the exact sound the originals got.
B) You play in a repertoire band and the song sheet for next Saturday has a U2 song followed by an early Police song. You have to get close to the spirit of The Edge and Andy Summers.
C) You are trying to find your sound.
Of these A) and B) are business reasons, but C) is in danger of being a search for one’s identity. Those of us with diffuse identities may be spending a lot of time on a fool’s errand.
Then there’s the electric guitar. There are a bunch of genre-based sounds for the electric. There’s the “jazz tone”; the “Nashville country twang”, if anyone still uses it; the “blues tone”, which is not to be confused with the edge-of-breakup “blues-rock” tone; there’s the heavily distorted “metal tone”, with variations for each type of metal; and then there’s the “ambient sound”, characterised by endless variations of echo, delay and reverb. There’s the Andy Summers chorus sound, the Eddie Van Halen “brown sound”, the Hank B Marvin 60’s instrumental sound, the “legendary Beano album sound”, and of course, there’s The Edge. The list goes on quite a way.
There’s a relationship between tone and music. Put a Blues Drive in the chain, and you’re going to wind up playing minor pentatonics. Flip to the neck pickup and keep a clean sound, and you’re going to play some kind of jazz. Perhaps if I knew what the music I was looking for was, I could find the sound for it. Or do we find the sound and then the music comes?
I want some sustain (reverb YES, compression NO) to open up the sound, a little texture (distortion or overdrive) and some variation (modulation). It needs to be full (some gain and easy on the treble) as well as well-defined (not too much gain or bass). No one effect should dominate, but all of them should be audible. Each individual note should be a sound interesting enough to listen to on its own. It has to work all over the neck, not just in one position, and it has to work at bedroom volumes.
Also, can I get some vanilla ice-cream and an espresso with that?
There are three reasons for spending a lot of time futzing around with pedals and effects boards. Such as I have been doing for far too long.
A) You play in a tribute band and want to get the exact sound the originals got.
B) You play in a repertoire band and the song sheet for next Saturday has a U2 song followed by an early Police song. You have to get close to the spirit of The Edge and Andy Summers.
C) You are trying to find your sound.
Of these A) and B) are business reasons, but C) is in danger of being a search for one’s identity. Those of us with diffuse identities may be spending a lot of time on a fool’s errand.
Friday, 22 March 2024
Why I Just Bought a HELIX Effects pedal
Helix have built a suite of products around a microprocesser and two chunks of software: a bunch of algorithms that emulate various well-known pedals and amps; and a configuration management program for those algorithms. (My guess is that they developed a bunch of specialised software objects on the way to writing the configuration manager.)
The Helix Floor (£1,199) is the top-end version: amp sims, cab sims, mic sims, and effects out the wazoo. The Helix LT (£839) is a (slightly) lite version of the Floor. Both have USB outputs for recording into a DAW, and both have expression pedals.
The Helix Effects (£479) is a single-chip unit that provides the “only” the effects. To record via USB into your DAW, something like the iRig HD2 (£89) is needed. If you want an expression pedal, you’ll have to buy one for a minimum of around £69.(1)
All three use the same configuration management software, and the same set-up of knobs, dials, touch-screens and buttons. The Floor and the Effects have “scribble strips” above each button that show what effect is assigned to it. The LT doesn’t.
All three can have “jam track” output from a phone sent through the FX Loop Return and patched straight to the output, by-passing the effects. (This means we don’t have to buy a mixer.)
The Effects has no amp sims and is for playing through a guitar amplifier and speaker. The LT and Floor have amp sims, and are for venue PA’s, studio desks, recording into DAWs, FRFR speakers and studio monitors. Putting amp sims into an amplifier is regarded as downright perverse.
Who are these for? This is GuitarLand, where hobbyists have loadsamoney, and the pros are broke. Given the cost of separate pedals, power supplies, and making a pedalboard, it’s the hobbyists who buy pedals. (Also, there’s a learning curve associated with the Helix and other stuff, whereas pedals are pretty much plug-it-in-and-twiddle-the-knobs.) The pros go for these integrated units. Less cost, less fuss to transport, and easier to set up on arrival.
I’m a broke hobbyist - the worst of both worlds. I think the functionality provided by the Helix Effects + USB recording + expression pedal is the starting point. And I don’t need to buy them all at once. At the start, I will play it through the Katana on the Clean channel with no effects - except maybe for some channel EQ.
How much am I losing without the amp sims? There’s nothing magic about amp / cabinet / mic sims: they are another bunch of effects, in this case a way of getting the Fender / Marshall / Vox / Hi Watt / Orange / (enter manufacturer name here) clean / driven / distortion / (enter name of effect here) sound that comes from the amp itself.(2)
Using amp sims would mean replacing the Katana, and this is where the previous discussion comes in. “Upgrading” to a conventional valve amp is not a feasible route, for reasons of volume, and it’s still an amp in its own right, so all I’m really doing is swapping one “flavoured” amp for another. The current batch of FRFR amp combos are aimed at being loud, rather than at the home market. That leaves powered studio monitors. A pair of Kali IN-8 (in white, black looks awful) is around £650, and they have their supporters. (There are monitors for £2,000+ the pair, and more than that.) And studio monitors are good for listening to output from DAWs, should I get that far.
Of course, I could swap out the Katana for the monitors whether I use amp sims or not. If I’m happy with the clean / driven / distortion tone I’m getting from the effects (aka pedals) of the Helix Effects, do I really need amp sims? I think the only answer is to try it and see.
(1) All prices exclude cable, which the marketeers assume us to have lying around, since we’re all old hands at this.
(2) Allegedly. Don’t forget that since the mid-70’s, at concerts, we heard those amps through mics, mixing boards and PA speakers, and in many cases what’s on a recording bears only a slight resemblence to what was heard in the studio.
The Helix Floor (£1,199) is the top-end version: amp sims, cab sims, mic sims, and effects out the wazoo. The Helix LT (£839) is a (slightly) lite version of the Floor. Both have USB outputs for recording into a DAW, and both have expression pedals.
The Helix Effects (£479) is a single-chip unit that provides the “only” the effects. To record via USB into your DAW, something like the iRig HD2 (£89) is needed. If you want an expression pedal, you’ll have to buy one for a minimum of around £69.(1)
All three use the same configuration management software, and the same set-up of knobs, dials, touch-screens and buttons. The Floor and the Effects have “scribble strips” above each button that show what effect is assigned to it. The LT doesn’t.
All three can have “jam track” output from a phone sent through the FX Loop Return and patched straight to the output, by-passing the effects. (This means we don’t have to buy a mixer.)
The Effects has no amp sims and is for playing through a guitar amplifier and speaker. The LT and Floor have amp sims, and are for venue PA’s, studio desks, recording into DAWs, FRFR speakers and studio monitors. Putting amp sims into an amplifier is regarded as downright perverse.
Who are these for? This is GuitarLand, where hobbyists have loadsamoney, and the pros are broke. Given the cost of separate pedals, power supplies, and making a pedalboard, it’s the hobbyists who buy pedals. (Also, there’s a learning curve associated with the Helix and other stuff, whereas pedals are pretty much plug-it-in-and-twiddle-the-knobs.) The pros go for these integrated units. Less cost, less fuss to transport, and easier to set up on arrival.
I’m a broke hobbyist - the worst of both worlds. I think the functionality provided by the Helix Effects + USB recording + expression pedal is the starting point. And I don’t need to buy them all at once. At the start, I will play it through the Katana on the Clean channel with no effects - except maybe for some channel EQ.
How much am I losing without the amp sims? There’s nothing magic about amp / cabinet / mic sims: they are another bunch of effects, in this case a way of getting the Fender / Marshall / Vox / Hi Watt / Orange / (enter manufacturer name here) clean / driven / distortion / (enter name of effect here) sound that comes from the amp itself.(2)
Using amp sims would mean replacing the Katana, and this is where the previous discussion comes in. “Upgrading” to a conventional valve amp is not a feasible route, for reasons of volume, and it’s still an amp in its own right, so all I’m really doing is swapping one “flavoured” amp for another. The current batch of FRFR amp combos are aimed at being loud, rather than at the home market. That leaves powered studio monitors. A pair of Kali IN-8 (in white, black looks awful) is around £650, and they have their supporters. (There are monitors for £2,000+ the pair, and more than that.) And studio monitors are good for listening to output from DAWs, should I get that far.
Of course, I could swap out the Katana for the monitors whether I use amp sims or not. If I’m happy with the clean / driven / distortion tone I’m getting from the effects (aka pedals) of the Helix Effects, do I really need amp sims? I think the only answer is to try it and see.
(1) All prices exclude cable, which the marketeers assume us to have lying around, since we’re all old hands at this.
(2) Allegedly. Don’t forget that since the mid-70’s, at concerts, we heard those amps through mics, mixing boards and PA speakers, and in many cases what’s on a recording bears only a slight resemblence to what was heard in the studio.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)